Document Type : research article

Authors

University of Isfahan

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1- Introduction
Lamiae writing has earned reputation with Arabian lamiae since the pre-Islamic period and continued with Ajam lamiae. Two contemporary Iranians, Mohammad Taqi Hojjat Al-Islam and Abdul-Hamid Sanandaji composed Turk lamiae in praise of Amiral-Mumenin Ali (AS) and Imam Mahdi, and Kurdish lamiae in praise of Hassan Ali Khan, the governor of the Sanandaj city respectively.
One of the critical aspects of aesthetic in the works of poets is the musical space of their poems that has a broader sense than in the past. In this study, the researchers try to analyze the musical structure of these two works by studying different types of music in the new critics such as inner, outer, side, and spiritual music. Some questions answered in this study include what was the art of the poet about music? How is the fitness of content with weight, frequency of words, and musical additions in these works?
2- Theoretical Framework
The classical rhetoric and the new rhetoric have differences in the type of analyzing texts. The classical rhetoric is considered as the rhetoric of examples and evidence which analyzes the cases as separate entities, thesis, and its judgment is not always accurate. In the old rhetoric, except for the connection and separation of the rhetorical analysis, it doesn’t go beyond one sentence while in analyzing the works of a poet, his poetry should completely be examined or the works of a poets should be thematically analyzed or at least a whole poem should be analyzed. This way can somehow understand the beauty of a poet's work or compare it to another. In the new rhetoric, this problem is to be solved. A more general pint of view in criticizing is held so that the judgement be more comprehensive. Poetry music is one of the artistic arenas of poets, which is very important in the Arabic poetry. In the new rheology, in addition to reviewing the weight and rhyme points, other aspects of music such as spiritual music and inner music are also considered. The results of the whole analysis of are held as factor in criticizing musical quality of a piece. Therefore, in the forthcoming analysis, we have tried to examine the music of poetry with a comprehensive look at the two odes.
3- Method
In the study of the poetry, bursts of poetry were analyzed and their defects were investigated. With regard to the internal music, two elegies are analyzed in beauty discussions of elegies about repetition, pun, derivation, and specification. In the analysis of the lateral music, the letters are identified and the defects are expressed. In the spiritual music, synchrony, similarity and conflict are reconsidered and devices such as symmetry, conflict, and arranging features are analyzed in the two Lamiae elegies.
4- Results and Discussion
Mohammad Taghi Hojjat al-Islam has composed his elegy in a simple measure. This measure is composed of two measures: Tafeileh of Mostafelon and Faaelon, and is fitted to some topics such as praise, pride, exclamation, and paradoxical feelings such as love, hate and Etc. This sea with the complete see, after the long see which composes one-third of the Arabic elegies is placed in the second order. This see must be used in some elegies with many verses to influence on the aim of praise to excite the addressee and affect his feelings. So, one can say that Lamiae Al-Turk that praises Amir Almomenin Ali and Emam Zaman and composed in some sea with many sections and many verses [158 verses], is fitted to the aim of the elegy. In spite of the ability of following the poet measure, has caught up in the trouble of avoiding twice. Abd Al-Hamid Sanandeji also has established his elegy on the same measure and since his elegy is panegyric, the fitting of measure and content have been observed. He also has the trouble of Tahrid. Sanadeji’s share of this repetition of this incompleteness is 4 cases.
Considering the internal music, two elegies are analyzed in the beauty discussions of elegies about repetition, pun, derivation, and specification. Repetition is challenged in three levels of method, words, and letters. During this process, it is obvious that poetry has used the repetition capacity for highlighting well some praise concepts. Even using seeming letters suggests that poet speaks of his proud moral features proudly and wants to mention their virtues of all. Pun is another type of repetition, but in different dimensions it is used 27 times in Hajjat Al-Islam’s elegy. Derivation appeared 20 times in this elegy and so it shows that in spite of the affectation of the internal music additions in poetry has used Hojjat Al-Islam’s elegy in his poetry. Abdol Hamid Sanandeji also didn’t ignore the musical aspect in his elegy whose verses are less than Hojjat Al-Islam’s. even according to the statistics about pun, he has used more than Hojjat Al-Islam’s and repetition in his poetries also is prominent and there is fitting among frequently letters and their meanings and content of elegy according to what Hassan Abbas wrote in the book features and meanings of the Arabic letters. Letter in two elegies is L and because of this, it is called as Lamiae. Sanandeji’s elegy is adjusted to all the rules for letters and rhymes, but Hojjat Al-Islam’s elegy encounters with two problems of assurance and depletion. In the spiritual music, synchrony, similarity, and conflict are reconsidered and devices such as symmetry, conflict, and arranging features are analyzed in two Lamiae elegies. In this area, also according to the acquired data, AL-Kurd’s Lamiae has more percent and implies Sanandeji’s success in using these terms in AL-Kurd’s Lamiae elegy.
5- Conclusion
Results showed that both poets have coalition between weight and meaning by the selection of extensive sea that has many sections and is appropriate for praise, but both odes faced with Tahrid fault.Considering music, two defects, i.e., guarantee and temptation, prevail over the Turk lamiae. According to the survey in spiritual music, al-Kurdish lamiae is superior to the Turk lamiae.

Keywords

کتابنامه
1. قرآن کریم.
2. ابن حسین، محمد. (1980م). المعارضات فی الشعر العربی، الریاض، النادی الأدبی.
3. ابن سینا، الشفا. (1956م). تحقیق زکریا یوسف، القاهرة: نشر وزارة التربیة والتعلیم - المطبعة الأمیریة.
4. ابن عبدالوهاب، اسامة. (2005). الدرر البهیة شرح المقدمة الجزریة فی علم التجوید، مکتبة الإیمان، الطبعة الثانیة.
5. ابن قیم الجوزی، أبوعبدالله محمد. (1327ق). الفوائد المشوق إلی علوم القرآن وعلم البدیع، تصحیح محمد بدرالدین النعسانی، قاهرة، مکتبة الخانجی، الطبعة الأولی.
6. أدونیس .( 1983 م) مقدمة للشعر العربی، بیروت، دارالعودة، الطبعة الرابعة.
7. أنیس، إبراهیم. (1952). موسیقی الشعر، مصر، مکتبة أنجلو، الطبعة الثانیة.
8. البجاری، یونس طرکی سلوم. (2008م). المعارضات فی الشعر الأندلسی، بیروت، دارالکتب العلمیة، الطبعة الأولی.
9. الجاحظ، أبو عثمان عمرو بن بحر. (د.ت). البیان والتبیین، تحقیق عبدالسلام هارون، قاهرة: مؤسسة الخانجی.
10. الجرجانی، عبدالقاهر. (1991م). أسرار البلاغة، تعلیق محمود محمد شاکر، جدة، دارالمدنی.
11. الجوینی، مصطفی الصاوی. (1985م). البلاغة العربیة تأصیل و تجدید، مصر، منشأة المعارف.
12. حبنکة المیدانی، عبدالحمن حسن. (1996م). البلاغة العربیة، دمشق، دارالقلم، الطبعة الأولی.
13. حجت الاسلام، میرزا محمد تقی،. (1386ش). دیوان نیّر، تحصیح مؤسسه فرهنگی مطالعاتی شمس الشموس، تهران، مؤسسه فرهنگی مطالعاتی شمس الشموس. چاپ اول.
14. حسن محمد، هادی. (2013م). ظاهرة التضاد فی سورة الأعراف وأثرها فی إیصال المعنی، مجلة مرکز دراسات الکوفة، العدد الحادی والثلاثون.
15. حمدی، برهان الدین. (1388). قصائد سه‌گانه، سنندج، پرتو بیان. چاپ اول.
16. حیرت سجادی، عبدالحمید. (1391). علما و دانشمندان کردستان در دویست سال اخیر، سنندج، آراس.چاپ اول.
17. الخطیب التبریزی،. (1986م). الوافی فی العروض والقوافی، تحقیق فخرالدین قباوة، دمشق، دارالفکر، الطبعة الرابعة.
18. خلیفه شوشتری، محمد إبراهیم،. (1387ش). الجامع فی العروض العربی بین النظریة و التطبیق، طهران، سمت، الطبعة الأولى.
19. روحانی، بابا مردوخ،. (1366). تاریخ مشاهیر کرد، تهران، سروش. چاپ اول.
20. السجلماسی، أبومحمد القاسم،. (1980م). المنزع البدیع فی تجنیس أسالیب البدیع، تحقیق علال الغازی، رباط: مکتبة المعارف، الطبعة الأولی.
21. سرباز، حسن، زرین‌پور، داود. (1390). بررسی تطبیقی فضای موسیقایی قصیده سعدی شیرازی و شمس الدین کوفی در رثای بغداد، مجله پژوهش‌های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، دوره دوم، شماره دوم، تابستان .
22. سلطان، منیر،.(1986). البدیع تأصیل وتجدید، الاسکندریة، المعارف.
23. شفیعی کدکنی، محمد رضا،. (1373). موسیقی شعر، تهران، آگاه،‌ چاپ چهارم.
24. شمیسا، سیروس. (1383). نگاهی تازه به بدیع، تهران، انتشارات فردوس، چاپ چهاردهم.
25. عباچی، أباذر. (1389). علوم البلاغة فی البدیع والعروض والقافیة، تهران، سمت، الطبعة الثالثة.
26. عباس، حسن. (1998). خصائص الحروف العربیة ومعانیها، دمشق، منشورات إتحاد کتاب العرب.
27. عبدالرئوف، محمد عونی،. (د.ت). القافیة والأصوات اللغویة، مصر، مکتبة الخانجی.
28. العقاد، مصطفی محمود. (1965). ساعات بین الکتب، بیروت: دارالکتاب العربی، الطبعة الثانیة.
29. عکاوی، انعام فوال. (1996). المعجم المفصل فی علوم البلاغة، بیروت، دارالکتب العلمیة، الطبعة الثانیة، 1996 م.
30. علی، عبدالرضا،. (1383). موسیقی شعر عربی سنتی و نو، ترجمه حسین یوسفی، مازندران، دانشگاه مازندران، چاپ اول.
31. غرة، محمد هیثم. (1415/995م). المستشار فی العروض و موسیقا الشعر، دمشق و بیروت، دار ابن کثیر و دار الکلم الطیب، الطبعة الأولی.
32. فاخوری، محمود،. (1996م). موسیقا الشعر العربی، سوریا، منشورات جامعة حلب، الطبعة الأولی.
33. قبانی، نزار. (1964م). الشعر قندیل أخضر، بیروت، منشورات المکتب التجاری، الطبعة الثانیة.
34. مستیری، إلیاس. (2012م). التکرار ودلالته فی دیوان الموت فی الحیاة لعبدالوهاب البیاتی، سکرة، مجلة کلیة الآداب واللغات بجامعة محمد خضیر، العددان العاشر والحادی عشر.
35. مطلوب، أحمد. (1986م). معجم المصطلحات البلاغیة وتطورها، بغداد، منشورات المجمع العلمی العراقی.
36. مطلوب، احمد. (1999م). حسن البصیر، کامل، البلاغة والتطبیق، العراق، وزارة التعلیم العالی والبحث العلمی، الطبعة الثانیة.
37. موافی، عبدالعزیز. (2004م). قصیدة النثر من التأسیس إلی المرجعیة، القاهرة، المجلس الأعلی للثقافة، الطبعة الأولی..
38. نصار، حسین.(1421م). القافیة فی العروض و الأدب، مکتبة الثقافة الدینیة، الطبعة الأولی.
39. هاشمی، أحمد. (2006م). جواهر البلاغة فی المعانی و البیان و البدیع، بیروت، مؤسسة الکتب الثقافیة.
40. یوسف سلوم، تامر سلوم. (1996م). من أسرار الإیقاع فی الشعر العربی، حولیة کلیة الإنسانیات والعلوم الاجتماعیة، جامعة قطر، العدد التاسع عشر.
CAPTCHA Image