Document Type : research article

Authors

1 PhD in Arabic Language and Literature,Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

2 Associate Professor in Arabic Language and Literature, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Linguistic, Payame Noor University, Tehran Iran

Abstract

Emotions are among the significant abstract concepts in cognitive semantics analyses. Human language, speech or written, is a representation which relatively reveals the complexities relevant to the conceptualizations of abstract concepts, including emotional ones. Image schemas, which are based on the idea of embodied cognition and experience, are the main mechanism in these meaning constructions. Thus, an analysis of image schema in a literary text can lead us to some aspects of the emotional system governing the literary and narrative text. This research aimed at describing and analyzing the emotion image schema in the novel The Cranes Nightly Travels in the Carnelian Towns (مسری الغرانیق فی مدن العقیق) by Amima al-Khamis (Saudi author), based on the Image Schema Theory of Lakoff and Johnson (1987). The objective of this research is identifying the author's subjectivity, mentality, and thought through linguistic devices which refer to emotions in the novel. The questions are: what emotion image schemas are in the text? How these schemas contribute to the emotion conceptualization in the mind of readers?, and what is their relation to the theme of the story? To find answer to these questions, the relevant schemas are extracted from the text through purposive sampling, and then explained on the basis of Image Schema Theory. The results show that the author could embody his ideas and thoughts through meaning constructing devices (linguistic forms in the text). These forms are based on image schemas including container, quantity, movement, path, orientation, near/far, and force schemas. These schemas project emotional meanings on the text and evoke them in the readers' mind, mostly metaphorically. Besides, these image-based conceptualizations are aligned with the narrator/author's rational subjectivity and philosophy. 

Keywords

Afrashi.A.(2018). Metaphor and Cognition. Tehran: Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural studies. [in Persian].
alkhamis O. (2017). masray algharaniq fi mudun aleaqiq. First edition Beirut: dar alsaaqi Publishing. [in Arabic]
Ibn Faris, A. (1979). A Dictionary of Language Measures. Edited by: Abd al-Salam Muhammad Harun, Cairo: Dar al-Fikr Publications. [in Arabic].
Ibn Manzur, M. (1955/1956). Tongue of Arabs (Lisan Al-Arab). Beirut: Dar Sadr. [ In Arabic]
Johnson, M. (2018). The Body in the Mind; The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Translated by: Jahanshah Mirzabeigi, Tehran: Agah. [in Persian].
Kovecses, Z. (2019). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Translated by Shirin Pourebrahim.
Lakaff. G. J. M. (2020). Metaphors We Live By. Tr. by Gandomkar Raheleh, Tehran: Nashr-e-elmi. [in Persian].
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things;What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: theUniversity of Chicago Press. [in Persian].
Rasekh Mahand, M. (2014).Cognitive Linguistics: Theories and Concepts. Tehran: Samat.[In Persian].
Rowshan, B. & Leila. A (2016). An introduction to cognitive semantics. Tehran: Elm Publication. [In Persian].
Safavi, K. (2000). An introduction to semantics. Tehran: Hozeh Honari. [in Persian].
Barcelona, A. (2020). "Introduction The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy"‏. in the book Esteāre va Majid ba rūikardi šenaxti (compiler Barcelona Antonio). Tr,by Sojoodi Farzan, Sadeqi Leyla, Amr allahi Tina, Tehran: Naqsh -e- Jahan: 49_95.
(https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.1). [In Persian].
Hajirajabi, N&. ed-al "Image force and orientation schemas in Mohammad Javad Jazaiery" prison." Journal of Arabic Language & Literature,12(1):  17-32.
(doi.org/10.22067/jall.v12.i1.53424). [In Persian].
Lakoff, G. (2011). "The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor" Translated by: Farzan Sojudi, In: Metaphor of the Basis of Thought and Beauty-Creating, Tehran: Surah Mehr: 135-230. (doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013). [in Persian].
Mohamadi Asiabadi. A.& ed- al. »he Container Schema and its Usage in the Expression of Mystical Experiences«. (2012). researches on mystical literature(gowhar-i-guya), 6-20(2):141-162. [In Persian].
Sadatolhosseini, R.&F. mirzaei.(2014). "the function of description in the novel of "Hina tarakna al-jisr,(When we left the bridge"(. Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, 6 )11(:1-26. (doi: 10.22067/JALL.V6I11.32403). [In Persian].
Shameli, N. &F. Haji Ghasemi. (2018). "Metaphorical Expansion of Mental Concepts Related to Doomsday in the Holy Quran from a Semantic Perspective (Based on Volumetric Schematic Schemas)". Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran,7(2) (14: 17-34.
 )http://dx.doi.org/10.22108/nrgs.2017.85874). [In Persian].
Taylor, J. R. (2011). "Category Extension by Metonymy and Metaphor", translated by Maryam Saberi Nouriifam; Metaphor Is the Basis of Thinking and Tools of Aesthetic Creation, Tehran: Surah Mehr: 35-66. (https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.3.323).[in Persian].
 
 
CAPTCHA Image