Document Type : research article

Authors

1 kharazmi university

2 . kharazmi university

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Maqamah is a type of literary text that has enjoyed a broad and pervasive position in certain periods of Arabic literature; a number of notable writers such as Badi' al-Zaman al-Hamadani, al-Hariri, etc. as well as Nasif al-Yaziji in the contemporary era have worked in this area. Since the majority of sciences deal with literature, various aspects of text linguistics have formed a vast portion of linguistic studies. Halliday’s functional approach is one of the prominent theories in this area in which novel dimensions of text linguistics are analyzed based on its role or function. Albeit, there is an ongoing debate among critics regarding the level of cohesion in “Maqamat”. In this study, it was attempted to examine text cohesion factors and their concordance in Maqamah Saviyah al-Hariri in light of Halliday and Hasan’s theory. It is worth mentioning the fact that there has been numerous studies in the area of cohesion and Maqamat, yet there has been no research focusing on “cohesion” and “aesthetics” in “Maqamat al-Hariri”

Review of Literature

In their studies in 1976, the founders of text cohesion theory, Halliday and Hasan, examined texts and relations among sentences and named such connections as cohesion. According to the views of these two linguists, cohesion is a semantic concept which highlights semantic relations present in texts and specifies them either as textual or non-textual (Halliday, 1976). They indicated five factors including reference, substitution, ellipsis, lexical cohesion, and conjunction as tools creating cohesion in texts; in this paper, conjunction is investigated.

Method

In this study, it is attempted to examine Maqamah Saviyah al-Hariri through the descriptive analytical method regarding conjunction, i.e. one of the factors for text cohesion, so as to provide answers to the following research questions according to statistics and analysis on the functions of conjunctive devices:
Which one of these subcategories (additive, causal, adversative, and temporal) are more frequent in Maqamah al-Hariri?
What impact has the author’s mastery of employing language capabilities and forming a rhythmic prose had on the aesthetics of the text’s cohesion?

Results and Discussion

As one of the elements of text cohesion, conjunctions involve the presence of sematic relations between sentences in a text which, according to Halliday and Hasan, can be classified into four types including additive, causal, adversative, and temporal. Being the eleventh “maqamah”, the story of Maqamah Saviyah takes place in Saveh cemetery (of which the name “maqamah” is a derivative) and entails a number of moral points. In the story, the protagonist arrives at the corpse being buried and following a shocking speech often accompanied by Quranic verses and hadith as well as rhetorical devices, similes, allusions and metaphors, he reminds people of bitter truths which persuades them to contemplate; he then fills his sack of gifts from the people and leaves the place.
In the Arabic language, devices for these conjunctive elements include “واو، فاء، لذا، لأنّ، لکن، ثمّ...” which play a clear role in Maqamah and even daily spoken language, to the extent that textual imagination appears to be impossible without such devices; this is due to the fact that the presence of a relation between sentences is necessary for the text to become cohesive. It is worth mentioning that the most used additive device is the conjunctive, “واو”, which plays its role within independent sentences throughout the text and contributes to the text’s cohesion. Other devices such as “فاء” involve broader functions, playing a significant role in various areas such as additive, causal and conditionals; on the other hand, in addition to bringing conjunction to the text, conjunctive devices result in grammatical balance and phonetic unity in sentences, inducing certain musicality to the text which has led to the formal aesthetics along with an increased semantic power in the text.

Conclusion

According to the important results of the study, additive and adversative devices involved the highest and lowest frequency of use in Maqamah Saviyah with 64.4 and 2.3%, respectively, which is due to the descriptive nature of the text. Causal and conditional relations with 12.3% and temporal relation with a frequency of 18.8% connect the events of the story, denoting death and separation, similar to a chain. In other words, the story begins with death and separation and ends with the separation between the narrator and the protagonist, the former leaving from the right side towards southern winds while the latter, Abu Zeyd Sarouji going left towards the northern wind. In addition to bringing semantic cohesion to the text, the use of conjunctions have also enhanced the aesthetic aspects of Maqamah.

Keywords

کتابنامه
منابع فارسی
1. آقاگل زاده، فردوس. (1394 ش). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی. چاپ سوم. تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
2. البرزی، پرویز. (1392 ش). مبانی زبانشناسی متن. چاپ دوم. تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر.
3. حریری، قاسم بن علی. (۱۳۶۵ ش). مقامات حریری. ترجمه علی رواقی. چاپ اول. چاپ افست گلشن.
4. سارلی، قلی ناصر؛ ایشانی، طاهره. (1390). «نظریه انسجام و هماهنگی انسجامی و کاربست آن در یک داستان کمینه فارسی». (قصه نردبان) دوفصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی زبان پژوهی دانشگاه الزهراء. بهاروتابستان. سال دوم شماره 4 (از51 تا77).
5. الفاخوری، حنّا. (1381 ش). تاریخ ادبیات زبان عربی. ترجمه عبدالمحمّدآیتی. چاپ پنجم. تهران: انتشارات طوس.
6. فخرایی، تژا. (1335 ش). فرایند تحلیل گفتمان. تهران: مرکز مطالعات وتحقیقات رسانه‌ها. سازمان چاپ وانتشارات.
7. نجفی پازکی، معصومه. (بی تا). «تقویت مهارت درک متن، آموزش نشانه‌های زبان‌شناختی انسجام
8. متن» اولین همایش میان رشته‌ای آموزش و یادگیری زبان. دانشگاه تهران. (از 301 تا 308).
منابع عربی
1. ابن خلکان، ابوبکر. (1978 م.1398 ه). وفیات الأعیان و انباءُ ابناءِ الزّمان. حققه: الدکتورإحسان عباس. المجلد الرابع. بیروت: دارصادر
2. حریری، قاسم بن علی. (1873 م). مقامات الحریری. بیروت: مطبعة المعارف.
3. الحموی الرومی، یاقوت. (1993 م). معجم الادباء ارشاد الاریب الی معرفة الادیب. تحقیق الدکتور احسان
4. عباس الجزء الخامس. الطبعة الاولی. بیروت، لبنان: دارالغرب الاسلامی.
5. الزنّاد، الأزهر. (1993 م) نسیج النّص. (بحث فی ما به یکون الملفوظ نصاً). الطبعة الأولی. بیروت: المرکز الثقافی العربی.
6. شبل محمد، عزة. (2009 م-1430 ق). علم لغة النص، النظریة و التطبیق. تقدیم سلیمان العطار. الطبعة الثانیة. القاهرة: مکتبة الآداب.
7. الشریشی، ابو العباس. (1413 ق، 1992 م). شرح مقامات الحریری. تحقیق محمد ابوالفضل ابراهیم. بیروت: المکتبة العصریة.
8. ضیف، شوقی. (۱۹۶۰ م). الفن و مذاهبه فی النثر العربیّ. الطبعة التاسعة. لبنان: دارالمعارف.
9. الفاخوری، حنّا. (1986 م). الجامع فی تاریخ الأدب العربیّ، الادب القدیم. الطبعة الأولی. بیروت: دارالجیل.
10. فرّوخ، عمر. (1401 ق). تاریخ الادب العربی الاعصر العباسیة. الطبعة الرابعة. بیروت، لبنان: دارالعلم للملایین.
11. مبارک، زکی. (۱۹۹۰ م). النثرالفنی فی القرن الرابع. الجزء الاول. الطبعة الثانیة. المکتبة التجاریة الکبری.
12. مکتبة المجمع، علم اللغة النصی بین النظریة والتطبیق، الخطابة النبویة نموذجا. (۲۰۰۶ م). علوم اللغة. المجلد التاسع.
13. العدد الثانی. مکتبة المجمع، کتب و بحوث علمیة.
منبع انگلیسی
1. Hallidy & Hasan.cohesion in English.london.longman.1976
CAPTCHA Image