Journal of Arabic Language & Literature

Re-reading the Semiotic Dimensions of Concepts in Imruʾ al-Qays’ Muʿallaqa Based on Charles Peirce’s Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ezzat Molla Ebrahimi 1
Mansooreh Ahmadi Jafari 2

1 Professor in Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Shar-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jall.2026.90487.1471
Abstract
Meaning in literary texts emerges beyond the explicit level of words, manifesting instead within latent layers of imagery, action, and collective memory. Accessing such meaning therefore necessitates an analytical framework capable of tracing the gradual unfolding of signification across successive layers. In this regard, Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic system—with its triadic distinction of icon, index, and symbol, corresponding to the phenomenological categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness—provides a robust conceptual model for examining the dynamics of meaning. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study examines the internal mechanisms of signification in the Mu‘allaqa of Imru’ al-Qais, a foundational ode of the pre-Islamic Arabic poetic tradition that offers fertile ground for exploring the evolution of meaning. Guided by Peirce’s three-level model, the study analyzes linguistic elements, narrative shifts, and transformations of imagery in order to elucidate how meaning is generated and progressively transformed within the poem’s structure, while also clarifying the relation between lived experience and the represented world. To achieve this aim, six central semantic categories were extracted from the text, and seventy-seven signs were classified and interpreted across the three semiotic levels. The findings indicate that icons foreground sensory experience, indices articulate the dialectical relation between action and meaning, and symbols stabilize signification within cultural-historical horizons. Consequently, the Mu‘allaqa’s multilayered structure, through a semiotic continuum, enters a system grounded in human action and meaning-making within a social context. This process generates collective reflections that transcend individual experience, ultimately culminating in an ontological reflection on impermanence and the passage of time.
 
 

Keywords

Peircean Semiotics
Icon
Index
Symbol
Imruʾ al-Qays’ Muʿallaqa
Subjects
Abu-Deeb, K. (1986). Dirāsāt al-Adabiyyah. Egypt: Egyptian General Book Organization.  ]In Arabic[
Afkhami Aqda, R. (2009). “Mythical Analysis of the Image of the Wild Bull in Pre-Islamic Poetry”. Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, 1, 1–24. Doi:10.22067/JALL.V1i1.3007. ]In Persian[
Ahmadi, B. (1991). Structure and Interpretation of the Text.Tehran: Markaz. ]In Persian[
Ahmadi, B. (2023). From Pictorial Signs to Text. 20th ed. Tehran: Markaz. ]In Persian[
Al-Ahmar, F. (2010). Muʿjam al-Sīmiyāʾiyyāt. Beirut: Dar al-ʿArabiyyah li-l-ʿUlum Nashirun. ]In Arabic[
Al-Bustani, E.F. (2008). Al-Majānī al-Ḥadīthah. Vol. 1, 4th ed. Lebanon: Dhawi al-Qurba. ]In Arabic[
Al-Jurmani, A.A. (2012). Ittijāhāt al-Naqd al-Sīmiyāʾī li al-Riwāyah al-ʿArabiyyah. Algiers: Ikhtilaf Publishers.
Al-Sarghini, M. (1407). Muḥāḍarāt fī al-Sīmūlūjiyā. Casablanca: Dar al-Thaqafa. ]In Arabic[
Arab, A & Sedighi, K. (2011). “The Parnassian Mode in the Muʿallaqa of Imruʾ al-Qays”. Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 3(4), 95–121.. ]In Persian[
Doi:10.22067/JALL.v3i4.9315
Benkrad, S. (2012). Al-Sīmiyāʾiyyāt: Mafāhīmuhā wa Taṭbīqātuhā.3rd ed. Latakia: Dar al-Hiwar.] In Arabic[
Bergman, M & Paavola, S (Eds.). (2003). The Commens Dictionary of   Peirce’s Terms: Peirce’s Terminology in His Own Words. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Bioumi Mehran, M. (n.d.). Dirāsāt fī Tārīkh al-ʿArab al-Qadīm.Vol. 1. Alexandria, Egypt: Dar al-Ma‘rifa al-Jami‘iyya. ] In Arabic[
Chandler, D. (2008). Semiotics: The Basics. Translated by M. Parsa.   Tehran: Soore Mehr. ]In Persian[
Colapietro, V. (1993). Glossary of Semiotics. New York: Paragon   House.
Culler, J. (2011). In Pursuit of Signs. Translated by. L. Sadeghi & T. Amrollahi. Tehran: Nashr-e Elm. ]In Persian[
Eco, U. (2010). Semiotics. Translated by P. Izadi. Tehran: Nashr-e Sales. ]In Persian[
Fidouh, A. (1983). Dalāliyat al-Naṣṣ al-Adabī. Algiers: Diwan al-Matbuʿat al-Jamiʿiyyah. ]In Arabic[
Haidar, A. (1996). “Muʿallaqah of Imruʾ al-Qays”. Al-Fusul: Journal of Contemporary Arabic Poetry Criticism, Part 2, 213–238. ]In Arabic[
Hannoun, M. (1987). Durūs fī al-Sīmiyāʾiyyāt. Casablanca: Dar Tubqal. ]In Arabic[
Hoopes, J (Ed.). (1991). Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Ibn al-Anbari, A. M. (1412 AH). Al-Ẓāhir fī Maʿānī Kalimāt al-Nās. Vol. 2. (n.p.): (n.p.). ]In Arabic[
Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari, A. (1964). Al-Sheʿr wa Al-Shuʿarāʾ. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Thaqafa. ]In Arabic[
Ibrahim, S. (2005). Al-Mutakhayyil Al-Thaqafi wa Nazariyyat Al-Tahlil Al-Nafsi Al-Mu‘asir. 1st Arabic ed. Cairo: Markaz al-Hadāra al-ʿArabiyya. ]In Arabic[
Liszka, J.J. (1996). A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Makaryk, I.R. (2014). Encyclopedia of Literary Theories. Translated by M. Mohajer & M. Nabavi. Tehran: Agah. ]In Persian[
Merabet, A. (2010). Al-Sīmiyāʾ al-ʿĀmmah wa Sīmiyāʾ al-Adab: Min Ajl Taṣawwur Shāmil. Beirut: Dar al-ʿArabiyyah li-l-ʿUlum Nashirun. ]In Arabic[
Mortaz, A. (2014). Semiotic and Anthropological Study of the Seven Muʿallaqat. Translated by S.H. Seyyedi. 2nd ed. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University Press. ]In Persian[
Mounsi, H. (2001). Falsafat al-Makān fī al-Shiʿr al-ʿArabī. Damascus: Ittihad al-Kuttab al-ʿArab. ]In Arabic[
Peirce, C.S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sajudi, F. (2008). Applied Semiotics. Tehran: Nashr-e Elm.
Sebeok, T.A. (2012). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Translated by M. Nobakht. Tehran: Nashr-e Elmi. ]In Persian[
Sharatah, I.(2005). Ẓawāhir Uslūbiyyah fī Shiʿr Badawī al-Jabal. Damascus: Ittihad al-Kuttab al-ʿArab. ]In Arabic[
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us